Bill: SB 492, 83(R) - 2013

Vote Recommendation

Vote Recommendation Economic Freedom Property Rights Personal Responsibility Limited Government Individual Liberty
Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral

Author(s)

Eddie Lucio Jr.

Bill Caption

Relating to the licensing and regulation of prescribed pediatric extended care centers.

Fiscal Notes

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB492, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2015. In addition to the effects of the bill described in the tables below, the bill has an indeterminate implication for Medicaid client services. The bill could result in a cost or a savings to Medicaid client services, but the effect is dependent both on client choices and Health and Human Services Commission action. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

Bill Analysis

Summary: SB 492 would create Chapter 248A (chapter), under Texas Health and Safety Code, that would require operators of prescribed pediatric extended care centers (care center) to obtain a license from the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS). SB 492 would:

Analysis: SB 492 would allow DADS to create a new type of provider for services that are already eligible for Medicaid reimbursement. By authorizing Pediatric Extended Care Centers, the state would allow a new deliver model for an already provided service. Based on the experience of numerous other states, it is reasonable to conclude that this new delivery model will lead to lower costs for the patients receiving these services. Currently these services are provided in home which means each nurse can only attend to one patient. By allowing the care to be provided at a stand-alone facility, each nurse will be able to care for multiple patients.

While this legislation is good in that it will allow a service model that is currently prohibited in Texas and may lead to lower costs, the regulatory scheme that would accompany the new service model is somewhat onerous. We agree that Medicaid reimbursable service providers should have proper oversight to prevent against fraud, abuse, and overutilization. However, some of the regulatory burdens are excessive. Elsewhere this session we have supported allowing practitioners with multiple offices to have one license that covers all the offices - it would make sense to allow that for PECCs as well. It is also somewhat heavy handed to allow a license to be revoked based on a felony conviction of any employee regardless of whether the conviction had anything to do with the facility or services provided. The licensing and regulation provisions could be made less stringent without compromising the integrity of the service model. We are neutral on SB 492.

 


Source URL (retrieved on 04/20/2024 02:04 AM): http://reports.texasaction.com/bill/83r/sb492?print_view=true