Bill
HB 3902
85(R) - 2017
House Business & Industry
House Business & Industry
Business, Industry, & Commerce
Civil Remedies
Counties
Vote Recommendation
Yes
-
Neutral
-
Neutral
-
Neutral
-
Positive
-
Neutral
Author(s)
Senfronia Thompson
Bill Caption
Relating to commencement and prosecution of certain actions by and
to investigations conducted by district and county attorneys under
the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act.
Fiscal Notes
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated due to authorizing certain legal actions by county and district attorneys related to the production, sale, distribution or promotion of a mind-altering synthetic substance. Any potential increase to the basic civil legal services subaccount within Judicial Fund No. 573 resulting from the bill's provision requiring settlements and civil penalties collected by district and county attorneys under the new authority, to be equally divided between the basic civil legal services subaccount within Judicial Fund No. 573 and the county,cannot be determined because insufficient information is available.
Bill Analysis
This bill would authorize district or county attorneys to take actions to enforce the portion of the code related to deceptive trade act’s prohibition on the production, sale, distribution, or promotion of certain synthetic substances. If a district or county attorney accepts assurance of voluntary compliance, or executes and serves a civil investigative demand, they would file the corresponding documents in the county or district court in which the violator resides or does business. This bill also specifies that an action may be taken by a district or county attorney only if the consumer protection division does not intend to act on the matter. Finally, this bill specifies how settlements or penalties collected by the district or county attorney would be divided.
Vote Recommendation Notes
When industries are selling intoxicating synthetic substances deceptively it is a core function of government to investigate and possibly halt the operation. Allowing district and county attorneys to take action against this conduct satisfies our commitment to limited government because it would provide greater accountability and efficiency.